Back

Volume 41 , Issue 6
November/December 2021
Pages e277–e286

Accuracy of CBCT in the Identification of Mental, Lingual, and Retromolar Foramina: A Comparison with Visual Inspection of Human Dry Mandibles

Fabio Savoldi, DDS, MDS, PhD/Madeline J. Y. Yon, BDS/Vincent M. K. Kwok, BDS/Andy W. K. Yeung, BDS, PhD/Ray Tanaka, DDS, PhD/James K. H. Tsoi, BSc, PhD/Jukka P. Matinlinna, BSc, MSc, PhD/Michael M. Bornstein, Prof Dr med dent

PMID: 34818398
DOI: 10.11607/prd.4770

The present dry-mandible study evaluated the presence of the mental (MF), lingual (LF), and retromolar (RMF) foramina to assess the accuracy of CBCT in detecting these anatomical structures. In total, 38 human dry mandibles were analyzed (30 men, 8 women; mean age: 61.9 ± 13.7 years). CBCT scans were taken using low-dose parameters, and LF, MF, and RMF were assessed visually and radiographically. Both the presence (yes/no) and the count (n) of each foramen were compared between CBCTs and visual assessment. For the presence assessment, only RMF exhibited a significant difference between CBCT and visual inspection (P = .035). For count, the RMF (P = .049) and paramedian LF (P = .003) exhibited differences between the two methods. The agreement between CBCT and visual inspection was excellent for the MF, moderate–excellent for the LF, and low–moderate for the RMF. Intra- and interassessor agreement varied from excellent (MF), to moderate–excellent (LF), and low–moderate (RMF). The LF and RMF represent challenging structures to identify on CBCT images due to their limited dimension. False negative findings in CBCTs in the assessment of foramina, especially LF, might lead to surgical complications during implant surgery.

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 

Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.